This almost always comes down to one specific piece of data: automatic matching needs your bank to send a unique ID along with the deposit amount and date. If your bank stops including that ID for a particular deposit or batch, matching can quietly stop working for just those transactions, without anything changing in your QuickBooks settings. Mobile deposits are a common example of this, since a mobile deposit can get batched or timestamped a little differently than a direct ACH transfer, which is enough to break the match.
Since manual Find Match is also coming up empty for you, not just automatic matching, work through these in order:
- Confirm the payment isn't still sitting in Undeposited Funds. If it hasn't been added to a bank deposit yet, QuickBooks has nothing to match the bank feed entry to.
- Check that the payment was recorded against the same bank account the deposit is showing up in. A payment entered under the wrong account won't appear as a match option.
- Make sure the transaction hasn't already been reconciled, and that it isn't already matched to a different downloaded transaction elsewhere in the feed. Either of these will make it disappear from the match options for this one.
- Widen your date range when using Find Match. If the mobile deposit posted a day or more later than usual, it can fall outside the search window you're used to using.
If all of that checks out and it still won't match, that's worth a closer look with support on this specific transaction, since it likely means your bank sent this deposit without the identifying details QuickBooks normally relies on. In the meantime, you can safely exclude the bank feed entry from For review, since the payment is already recorded in the customer's account and excluding it won't affect your books.
For the full details on how automatic matching works and what stops it: Automatic matching for QuickBooks Payments. For the manual matching workflow: Match online bank transactions.
If this keeps happening specifically with mobile deposits going forward, it's worth mentioning that pattern to support directly, since a repeat issue tied to one deposit method points more toward something on the bank's data feed than a one-off transaction.